𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲
  • Legal News
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Criminal Defense Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Bankruptcy Law
Reading: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Conservative Legal Theory, Preserves State Courts’ Role in Election Rules
Share
𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲
Aa
  • Legal News
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Criminal Defense Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Bankruptcy Law
Search
  • Legal News
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Criminal Defense Law
  • Family Law
  • Immigration Law
  • Bankruptcy Law
Have an existing account? Sign In
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
© 2023 Bestratedattorney.com. All Rights Reserved.
𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 > Blog > Legal News > U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Conservative Legal Theory, Preserves State Courts’ Role in Election Rules
Legal News

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Conservative Legal Theory, Preserves State Courts’ Role in Election Rules

Todd Bennett
Last updated: 2023/06/28 at 11:22 AM
Todd Bennett
Share
US Supreme Court
Photo: Gettyimages
SHARE

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a legal doctrine supported by many conservatives on Tuesday that would have given state legislators wide latitude in determining election laws and redistricting districts.

North Carolina’s highest court had already rejected the state’s congressional district plan due to its political prejudice against Democratic voters, which gave rise to the issue at hand. In a 6-3 ruling in which Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority, the court rejected the “independent state legislature” thesis, which argued that state courts and constitutions should be exempt from federal election regulation.

With this decision, state courts will be able to continue protecting democratic principles in election disputes in the United States.

The “Independent State Legislature” Doctrine

Whether or whether the “independent state legislature” theory should be accepted was central to the issue. Conservatives have long championed a once-fringe notion that sought to eliminate the impact of state courts and constitutions on federal elections.

Legal professors, Democrats, and voting rights activists all voiced concern that this approach may undermine democratic norms. Supporters of the hypothesis pointed to the section in the United States Constitution that says each state’s legislature gets to decide the “times, places, and manner” of federal elections.

However, Chief Justice Roberts rejected the doctrine’s applicability by emphasizing that the Elections Clause did not protect state legislators from state court scrutiny.

Supreme Court Upholds State Court Review

By reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the importance of state constitutions in regulating federal elections and protected the jurisdiction of state courts to consider certain sorts of matters involving elections.

The three liberal justices on the Court joined Chief Justice Roberts and the two conservative justices, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, in the majority. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissented, saying the case should have been thrown out.

Impact on Gerrymandering and Voting Restrictions

Significant ramifications for political gerrymandering and voting limitations follow from the rejection of the “independent state legislature” theory. Gerrymandering is the practice of drawing district lines to give one political party an advantage in elections.

Fears were voiced by those opposed to the concept that its adoption would pave the way for more restrictive voting laws and more drastic political gerrymandering by state legislatures. It’s important to remember that in a case from 2019, the Supreme Court forbade federal courts from preventing political gerrymandering.

Political Landscape and Future Implications

Some Republican lawmakers adopted the theory, and they implemented legislation and limitations in a number of states restricting the right to vote in the name of preventing voter fraud. Ex-President Trump’s unfounded assertions of rampant vote fraud in the 2020 election prompted this stepped-up attempt.

While the decision is a win for the right to vote, Chief Justice Roberts was careful to remind state courts that they should not usurp the power given to them by the state legislatures under the U.S. Constitution.

In cases when state courts reject legislative maps and assume responsibility for redistricting, this judgment leaves the door open for future challenges and arguments.

Todd Bennett June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
By Todd Bennett
Todd Bennett is a five-year criminal defense attorney. He is dedicated to defending the accused and has won several criminal cases. Todd Bennett uses his significant criminal justice experience to create customized defense tactics for each client. Todd Bennett frequently speaks at legal gatherings, offering his criminal defense expertise and staying abreast of industry advancements. Criminal defendants trust Todd Bennett's vigorous advocacy and commitment to client success.
Previous Article Ne-Yo Ne-Yo’s Former Flame, Sade Bagnerise, Seeks Custody and Support for Their Children
Next Article First Amendment Exploring the Evolution of the First Amendment: From the Founding Fathers to the Modern Era

You Might Also Like

Costner Divorce
Legal News

Costner Divorce Drama Continues as Estranged Wife Claims She Owes Over $300K in Legal Fees

Kevin Costner and his estranged wife Christine Baumgartner are in the midst of bitter divorce procedures. Baumgartner believes she owes…

5 Min Read
China Evergrande Group
Legal News

Chinese Developer Evergrande Files for Bankruptcy with $335B in Debt

Due to $335 billion in debt, the massive Chinese real estate developer Evergrande Group has filed for bankruptcy in the…

2 Min Read
Hunter Biden
Legal News

Hunter Biden Indicted on Federal Gun Charges in Run-Up to 2024 Election

A federal grand jury has accused Hunter Biden, son of former Vice President and current Secretary of the Treasury, on…

6 Min Read
Gun Ban in Albuquerque
Legal News

New Mexico Governor Implements 30-Day Firearm Ban in Response to Rising Gun Violence

In a bold move to combat escalating gun violence, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham issued a 30-day ban on…

5 Min Read
© Bestratedattorney.com. All Rights Reserved.
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?