Maine’s Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Trump’s Ballot Eligibility, Deferring to U.S. Supreme Court

Emma Grant
  • Maine's top court has declined to rule on whether former President Donald Trump can stay on the state's ballot, deferring to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on a similar case in Colorado.
  • Maine's Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, ruled that Trump didn't meet ballot criteria under the insurrection clause, but a judge placed that judgment on hold pending the Supreme Court's Colorado case decision.
  • On Feb. 8, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on the Colorado case, which might affect Trump's campaign and the 14th Amendment's insurrection clause. Maine's primary is on March 5.

The highest court in Maine has recently decided not to get involved in the argument over whether or not former President Donald Trump can run for office in the state’s primary election.

This decision backs up an earlier one that said the U.S. Supreme Court should first decide a similar case in Colorado before making a final decision in Maine.

The trouble started when Shenna Bellows, the Democrat who is Secretary of State for Maine, said that Trump did not meet the requirements to be on the ticket under the 14th Amendment’s “insurrection clause.”

A judge put off this ruling until the U.S. Supreme Court decided the similar case in Colorado.

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court threw out Bellows’ appeal unanimously, saying that the uncertainty about Trump’s eligibility to run for office was not enough to warrant quick appellate review.

Maine’s primary is on March 5, and the state has already started mailing ballots to people in other countries. This move has big effects.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which says that people who have “engaged in insurrection” cannot hold public office, is at the heart of the legal debate. The U.S. Supreme Court has never directly looked at this part of the law in terms of a past president’s eligibility.

Trump has strongly denied that Bellows had anything to do with the case, accusing her of bias and saying that her actions were part of a larger plot to keep him from running for office. In response, Bellows made it clear that her choice was based on state law and that she would follow the court’s final ruling.

The result of this court case will have huge effects, not only on Trump’s chances of running for office in Maine, but also on how the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment is interpreted.

The U.S. Supreme Court is getting ready to hear arguments in the Colorado case on February 8. All eyes will be on these decisions, which will have a big impact on politics before the primary elections.

This decision by Maine’s highest court shows how complicated and important the legal problems are. It also sets the stage for a key decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that will have a huge effect on the next election.

Share This Article
Emma Grant is a highly regarded legal news expert with a deep understanding of constitutional law and its implications in contemporary society. With her extensive background in legal journalism and analysis, Emma Grant has established herself as a trusted authority on the intersection of law, policy, and society.